Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 3.1 km apart, on the same open data. Bardia scores higher on 4 of 10 measures.
| Bardia | Macquarie Fields | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 29 | 74 |
| Safety | 56 | 10 |
| Wealth | 59 | 6 |
| Value | 58 | 34 |
| Parks | 84 | 81 |
| Cafés | 13 | 13 |
| Transit | 2 | 24 |
| Green space | 55 | 62 |
| Active & healthy | 34 | 49 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 36 | 73 |
| Median rent | $550/wk | $340/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $1,160,000 | $1,053,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 64 | — |
| Population | 5,747 | 14,023 |
| Full profile | Bardia in full | Macquarie Fields in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Bardia scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Macquarie Fields has the lower median house price of the two ($1,053,000 vs $1,160,000).
Bardia scores higher on 4 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Bardia or Macquarie Fields.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →