Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 2.4 km apart, on the same open data. Bonnyrigg Heights scores higher on 4 of 10 measures.
| Bonnyrigg Heights | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 61 | 52 |
| Safety | 75 | 78 |
| Wealth | 29 | 58 |
| Value | 52 | 57 |
| Parks | 78 | 54 |
| Cafés | 13 | 13 |
| Transit | 71 | 7 |
| Green space | 76 | 80 |
| Active & healthy | 32 | 38 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 64 | 18 |
| Median rent | $450/wk | $550/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $1,320,000 | $1,335,000 |
| House sales this quarter | — | 54 |
| Population | 7,369 | 6,906 |
| Full profile | Bonnyrigg Heights in full | Cecil Hills in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Cecil Hills scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Bonnyrigg Heights has the lower median house price of the two ($1,320,000 vs $1,335,000).
Bonnyrigg Heights scores higher on 4 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Bonnyrigg Heights or Cecil Hills.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →