Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 1.1 km apart, on the same open data. Busby scores higher on 3 of 10 measures.
| Busby | Heckenberg | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 14 | 38 |
| Safety | 17 | 23 |
| Wealth | 3 | 2 |
| Value | 10 | 22 |
| Parks | 77 | 66 |
| Cafés | 13 | 13 |
| Transit | 86 | 95 |
| Green space | 78 | 57 |
| Active & healthy | 34 | 39 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 74 | 77 |
| Median rent | $330/wk | $300/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $1,141,000 | $1,141,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 63 | 63 |
| Population | 4,446 | 3,263 |
| Full profile | Busby in full | Heckenberg in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Heckenberg scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Busby and Heckenberg have the same median house price.
Busby scores higher on 3 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Busby or Heckenberg.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →