Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 1.6 km apart, on the same open data. Cabramatta scores higher on 6 of 10 measures.
| Cabramatta | Warwick Farm | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 21 | 48 |
| Safety | 5 | 2 |
| Wealth | 3 | 2 |
| Value | 11 | 8 |
| Parks | 10 | 48 |
| Cafés | 77 | 58 |
| Transit | 33 | 10 |
| Green space | 28 | 70 |
| Active & healthy | 44 | 69 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 33 | 30 |
| Median rent | $330/wk | $327/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $1,316,000 | $1,300,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 66 | 152 |
| Population | 21,142 | 6,135 |
| Full profile | Cabramatta in full | Warwick Farm in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Cabramatta scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Warwick Farm has the lower median house price of the two ($1,300,000 vs $1,316,000).
Cabramatta scores higher on 6 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Cabramatta or Warwick Farm.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →