Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 1.4 km apart, on the same open data. Carnes Hill scores higher on 4 of 10 measures.
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 26 | 30 |
| Safety | 35 | 55 |
| Wealth | 70 | 32 |
| Value | 58 | 30 |
| Parks | 4 | 23 |
| Cafés | 86 | 13 |
| Transit | 4 | 40 |
| Green space | 20 | 34 |
| Active & healthy | 36 | 30 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 40 | 84 |
| Median rent | $600/wk | $490/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $1,335,000 | $1,335,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 54 | 54 |
| Population | 3,332 | 4,572 |
| Full profile | Carnes Hill in full | Hoxton Park in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Hoxton Park scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Carnes Hill and Hoxton Park have the same median house price.
Carnes Hill scores higher on 4 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Carnes Hill or Hoxton Park.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →