Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 2.0 km apart, on the same open data. Chipping Norton scores higher on 6 of 10 measures.
| Chipping Norton | Warwick Farm | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 18 | 48 |
| Safety | 48 | 2 |
| Wealth | 35 | 2 |
| Value | 35 | 8 |
| Parks | 72 | 48 |
| Cafés | 38 | 58 |
| Transit | 10 | 10 |
| Green space | 71 | 70 |
| Active & healthy | 60 | 69 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 31 | 30 |
| Median rent | $500/wk | $327/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $1,300,000 | $1,300,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 152 | 152 |
| Population | 9,412 | 6,135 |
| Full profile | Chipping Norton in full | Warwick Farm in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Chipping Norton scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Chipping Norton and Warwick Farm have the same median house price.
Chipping Norton scores higher on 6 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Chipping Norton or Warwick Farm.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →