Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 1.0 km apart, on the same open data. Connells Point scores higher on 7 of 10 measures.
| Connells Point | Hurstville Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 37 | 10 |
| Safety | 90 | 86 |
| Wealth | 70 | 59 |
| Value | 59 | 33 |
| Parks | 84 | 73 |
| Cafés | 13 | 60 |
| Transit | 21 | 54 |
| Green space | 67 | 77 |
| Active & healthy | 44 | 40 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 32 | 18 |
| Median rent | $600/wk | $600/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $2,300,000 | $2,340,000 |
| Population | 2,884 | 2,606 |
| Full profile | Connells Point in full | Hurstville Grove in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Connells Point scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Connells Point has the lower median house price of the two ($2,300,000 vs $2,340,000).
Connells Point scores higher on 7 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Connells Point or Hurstville Grove.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →