Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 2.2 km apart, on the same open data. Eastwood scores higher on 6 of 10 measures.
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 58 | 88 |
| Safety | 42 | 71 |
| Wealth | 31 | 30 |
| Value | 53 | 37 |
| Parks | 72 | 58 |
| Cafés | 66 | 13 |
| Transit | 63 | 44 |
| Green space | 54 | 76 |
| Active & healthy | 58 | 73 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 45 | 42 |
| Median rent | $450/wk | $475/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $2,660,000 | $2,660,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 33 | 33 |
| Population | 18,695 | 12,492 |
| Full profile | Eastwood in full | Marsfield in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Marsfield scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Eastwood and Marsfield have the same median house price.
Eastwood scores higher on 6 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Eastwood or Marsfield.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →