Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 2.1 km apart, on the same open data. Fairfield Heights scores higher on 3 of 10 measures.
| Fairfield Heights | Smithfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 2 | 50 |
| Safety | 52 | 34 |
| Wealth | 4 | 5 |
| Value | 1 | 4 |
| Parks | 10 | 36 |
| Cafés | 13 | 13 |
| Transit | 52 | 34 |
| Green space | 0 | 48 |
| Active & healthy | 9 | 37 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 67 | 18 |
| Median rent | $450/wk | $400/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $1,320,000 | $1,415,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 67 | 44 |
| Population | 8,269 | 13,160 |
| Full profile | Fairfield Heights in full | Smithfield in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Fairfield Heights scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Fairfield Heights has the lower median house price of the two ($1,320,000 vs $1,415,000).
Fairfield Heights scores higher on 3 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Fairfield Heights or Smithfield.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →