Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 1.8 km apart, on the same open data. Nirimba Fields scores higher on 4 of 10 measures.
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 56 | 24 |
| Safety | 36 | 58 |
| Wealth | 67 | 52 |
| Value | 99 | 91 |
| Parks | 42 | 51 |
| Cafés | 13 | 28 |
| Transit | 2 | 34 |
| Green space | 14 | 76 |
| Active & healthy | 48 | 48 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 48 | 27 |
| Median rent | $410/wk | $450/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $1,350,000 | $1,350,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 66 | 66 |
| Population | 1,632 | 27,893 |
| Full profile | Nirimba Fields in full | Quakers Hill in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Quakers Hill scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Nirimba Fields and Quakers Hill have the same median house price.
Nirimba Fields scores higher on 4 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Nirimba Fields or Quakers Hill.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →