Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 0.8 km apart, on the same open data. Potts Point scores higher on 4 of 10 measures.
| Potts Point | Woolloomooloo | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 62 | 54 |
| Safety | 1 | 2 |
| Wealth | 36 | 34 |
| Value | 46 | 30 |
| Parks | 34 | 93 |
| Cafés | 98 | 94 |
| Transit | 93 | 98 |
| Green space | 17 | 49 |
| Active & healthy | 54 | 63 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 70 | 92 |
| Median rent | $490/wk | $500/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | — | — |
| Population | 7,183 | 3,792 |
| Full profile | Potts Point in full | Woolloomooloo in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Woolloomooloo scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Potts Point scores higher on 4 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Potts Point or Woolloomooloo.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →