Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 1.2 km apart, on the same open data. St Johns Park scores higher on 4 of 10 measures.
| St Johns Park | Wakeley | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 20 | 37 |
| Safety | 80 | 70 |
| Wealth | 14 | 13 |
| Value | 9 | 8 |
| Parks | 66 | 80 |
| Cafés | 13 | 45 |
| Transit | 66 | 43 |
| Green space | 88 | 89 |
| Active & healthy | 34 | 47 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 28 | 47 |
| Median rent | $450/wk | $450/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $1,525,000 | $1,525,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 71 | 71 |
| Population | 6,302 | 4,893 |
| Full profile | St Johns Park in full | Wakeley in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
St Johns Park scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
St Johns Park and Wakeley have the same median house price.
St Johns Park scores higher on 4 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for St Johns Park or Wakeley.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →