Two neighbouring Adelaide suburbs, 2.0 km apart, on the same open data. Eden Hills scores higher on 6 of 10 measures.
| Eden Hills | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 64 | 36 |
| Safety | 84 | 35 |
| Wealth | 87 | 24 |
| Value | 73 | 12 |
| Parks | 36 | 94 |
| Cafés | 28 | 70 |
| Transit | 13 | 25 |
| Green space | 82 | 81 |
| Active & healthy | 58 | 63 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 72 | 36 |
| Median rent | $388/wk | $333/wk |
| Median house price (Apr–Jun 2026) | $1,262,550 | $1,230,750 |
| House sales this quarter | 9 | 15 |
| Population | 3,020 | 3,073 |
| Full profile | Eden Hills in full | Pasadena in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 274 Adelaide suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Eden Hills scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Pasadena has the lower median house price of the two ($1,230,750 vs $1,262,550).
Eden Hills scores higher on 6 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Eden Hills or Pasadena.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Adelaide suburbs →