Two neighbouring Adelaide suburbs, 1.3 km apart, on the same open data. Glen Osmond scores higher on 8 of 10 measures.
| Glen Osmond | Glenunga | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 76 | 84 |
| Safety | 49 | 35 |
| Wealth | 98 | 79 |
| Value | 91 | 58 |
| Parks | 51 | 42 |
| Cafés | 93 | 28 |
| Transit | 47 | 38 |
| Green space | 32 | 30 |
| Active & healthy | 67 | 55 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 71 | 80 |
| Median rent | $430/wk | $380/wk |
| Median house price (Apr–Jun 2026) | $2,200,000 | $2,271,111 |
| House sales this quarter | 9 | 12 |
| Population | 2,154 | 2,184 |
| Full profile | Glen Osmond in full | Glenunga in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 274 Adelaide suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Glen Osmond scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Glen Osmond has the lower median house price of the two ($2,200,000 vs $2,271,111).
Glen Osmond scores higher on 8 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Glen Osmond or Glenunga.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Adelaide suburbs →