Two neighbouring Adelaide suburbs, 1.5 km apart, on the same open data. Seacombe Heights scores higher on 8 of 10 measures.
| Seacombe Heights | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 61 | 13 |
| Safety | 93 | 43 |
| Wealth | 79 | 13 |
| Value | 58 | 11 |
| Parks | 83 | 24 |
| Cafés | 28 | 28 |
| Transit | 41 | 41 |
| Green space | 58 | 50 |
| Active & healthy | 59 | 32 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 72 | 25 |
| Median rent | $380/wk | $295/wk |
| Median house price (Apr–Jun 2026) | $1,050,000 | $1,003,250 |
| House sales this quarter | 9 | 6 |
| Population | 1,549 | 2,787 |
| Full profile | Seacombe Heights in full | Sturt in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 274 Adelaide suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Seacombe Heights scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Sturt has the lower median house price of the two ($1,003,250 vs $1,050,000).
Seacombe Heights scores higher on 8 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Seacombe Heights or Sturt.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Adelaide suburbs →