Two neighbouring Adelaide suburbs, 1.8 km apart, on the same open data. Surrey Downs scores higher on 3 of 10 measures.
| Surrey Downs | Wynn Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 84 | 50 |
| Safety | 45 | 85 |
| Wealth | 57 | 64 |
| Value | 60 | 85 |
| Parks | 94 | 94 |
| Cafés | 28 | 28 |
| Transit | 83 | 19 |
| Green space | 90 | 94 |
| Active & healthy | 68 | 57 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 65 | 91 |
| Median rent | $330/wk | $310/wk |
| Median house price (Apr–Jun 2026) | $850,000 | $995,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 12 | 14 |
| Population | 3,358 | 7,865 |
| Full profile | Surrey Downs in full | Wynn Vale in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 274 Adelaide suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Wynn Vale scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Surrey Downs has the lower median house price of the two ($850,000 vs $995,000).
Surrey Downs scores higher on 3 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Surrey Downs or Wynn Vale.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Adelaide suburbs →