Two neighbouring Brisbane suburbs, 1.4 km apart, on the same open data. Carseldine scores higher on 4 of 10 measures.
| Carseldine | Fitzgibbon | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 40 | 43 |
| Safety | 80 | 80 |
| Wealth | 50 | 25 |
| Value | 40 | 30 |
| Parks | 70 | 85 |
| Cafés | 59 | 62 |
| Transit | 51 | 46 |
| Green space | 53 | 67 |
| Active & healthy | 52 | 51 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 18 | 50 |
| Median rent | $435/wk | $385/wk |
| Median house price (Apr 2025–Mar 2026) | $1,272,500 | $956,539 |
| House sales in the 12 months to March 2026 | 86 | 142 |
| Population | 10,093 | 6,296 |
| Full profile | Carseldine in full | Fitzgibbon in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 277 Brisbane suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Carseldine and Fitzgibbon score the same for safety on official crime statistics.
Fitzgibbon has the lower median house price of the two ($956,539 vs $1,272,500).
Carseldine scores higher on 4 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Carseldine or Fitzgibbon.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Brisbane suburbs →