Two neighbouring Brisbane suburbs, 2.8 km apart, on the same open data. Collingwood Park scores higher on 6 of 10 measures.
| Collingwood Park | Redbank | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 36 | 48 |
| Safety | 17 | 17 |
| Wealth | 28 | 8 |
| Value | 62 | 6 |
| Parks | 67 | 54 |
| Cafés | 34 | 46 |
| Transit | 27 | 17 |
| Green space | 75 | 36 |
| Active & healthy | 40 | 53 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 52 | 36 |
| Median rent | $340/wk | $350/wk |
| Median house price (Apr 2025–Mar 2026) | $840,000 | $840,000 |
| House sales in the 12 months to March 2026 | 245 | 245 |
| Population | 9,246 | 2,931 |
| Full profile | Collingwood Park in full | Redbank in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 277 Brisbane suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Collingwood Park and Redbank score the same for safety on official crime statistics.
Collingwood Park and Redbank have the same median house price.
Collingwood Park scores higher on 6 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Collingwood Park or Redbank.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Brisbane suburbs →