Two neighbouring Brisbane suburbs, 0.9 km apart, on the same open data. Kelvin Grove scores higher on 6 of 10 measures.
| Kelvin Grove | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 53 | 28 |
| Safety | 2 | 2 |
| Wealth | 23 | 78 |
| Value | 18 | 77 |
| Parks | 59 | 42 |
| Cafés | 92 | 88 |
| Transit | 94 | 98 |
| Green space | 48 | 18 |
| Active & healthy | 60 | 42 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 100 | 82 |
| Median rent | $400/wk | $430/wk |
| Median house price (Apr 2025–Mar 2026) | $1,500,000 | $1,800,000 |
| House sales in the 12 months to March 2026 | 72 | 81 |
| Population | 7,909 | 5,834 |
| Full profile | Kelvin Grove in full | Red Hill in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 277 Brisbane suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Kelvin Grove and Red Hill score the same for safety on official crime statistics.
Kelvin Grove has the lower median house price of the two ($1,500,000 vs $1,800,000).
Kelvin Grove scores higher on 6 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Kelvin Grove or Red Hill.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Brisbane suburbs →