Two neighbouring Brisbane suburbs, 2.5 km apart, on the same open data. Kippa-Ring scores higher on 3 of 10 measures.
| Kippa-Ring | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 48 | 75 |
| Safety | 42 | 42 |
| Wealth | 7 | 3 |
| Value | 4 | 1 |
| Parks | 49 | 51 |
| Cafés | 36 | 82 |
| Transit | 57 | 77 |
| Green space | 52 | 42 |
| Active & healthy | 53 | 61 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 62 | 70 |
| Median rent | $350/wk | $335/wk |
| Median house price (Apr 2025–Mar 2026) | $900,000 | $999,000 |
| House sales in the 12 months to March 2026 | 267 | 167 |
| Population | 9,745 | 10,460 |
| Full profile | Kippa-Ring in full | Redcliffe in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 277 Brisbane suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Kippa-Ring and Redcliffe score the same for safety on official crime statistics.
Kippa-Ring has the lower median house price of the two ($900,000 vs $999,000).
Kippa-Ring scores higher on 3 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Kippa-Ring or Redcliffe.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Brisbane suburbs →