Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 2.0 km apart, on the same open data. Alfords Point scores higher on 2 of 10 measures.
| Alfords Point | Revesby Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 30 | 68 |
| Safety | 71 | 91 |
| Wealth | 82 | 72 |
| Value | 23 | 39 |
| Parks | 58 | 67 |
| Cafés | 13 | 64 |
| Transit | 6 | 17 |
| Green space | 92 | 94 |
| Active & healthy | 55 | 66 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 20 | 10 |
| Median rent | $768/wk | $650/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $1,880,000 | $1,690,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 59 | 33 |
| Population | 3,131 | 1,916 |
| Full profile | Alfords Point in full | Revesby Heights in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Revesby Heights scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Revesby Heights has the lower median house price of the two ($1,690,000 vs $1,880,000).
Alfords Point scores higher on 2 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Alfords Point or Revesby Heights.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →