Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 1.4 km apart, on the same open data. Ashbury scores higher on 8 of 10 measures.
| Ashbury | Croydon Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 88 | 73 |
| Safety | 68 | 60 |
| Wealth | 68 | 23 |
| Value | 51 | 64 |
| Parks | 43 | 73 |
| Cafés | 70 | 13 |
| Transit | 51 | 50 |
| Green space | 81 | 41 |
| Active & healthy | 85 | 48 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 78 | 48 |
| Median rent | $600/wk | $410/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $2,335,000 | $1,980,000 |
| Population | 3,353 | 10,929 |
| Full profile | Ashbury in full | Croydon Park in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Ashbury scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Croydon Park has the lower median house price of the two ($1,980,000 vs $2,335,000).
Ashbury scores higher on 8 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Ashbury or Croydon Park.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →