Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 2.1 km apart, on the same open data. Bankstown scores higher on 6 of 10 measures.
| Bankstown | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 28 | 54 |
| Safety | 6 | 47 |
| Wealth | 6 | 16 |
| Value | 5 | 4 |
| Parks | 49 | 44 |
| Cafés | 66 | 13 |
| Transit | 74 | 50 |
| Green space | 34 | 20 |
| Active & healthy | 36 | 48 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 92 | 52 |
| Median rent | $400/wk | $500/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $1,608,000 | $1,608,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 38 | 38 |
| Population | 34,933 | 13,066 |
| Full profile | Bankstown in full | Condell Park in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Condell Park scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Bankstown and Condell Park have the same median house price.
Bankstown scores higher on 6 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Bankstown or Condell Park.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →