Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 1.8 km apart, on the same open data. Belfield scores higher on 3 of 10 measures.
| Belfield | Croydon Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 26 | 73 |
| Safety | 62 | 60 |
| Wealth | 18 | 23 |
| Value | 18 | 64 |
| Parks | 6 | 73 |
| Cafés | 13 | 13 |
| Transit | 78 | 50 |
| Green space | 44 | 41 |
| Active & healthy | 37 | 48 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 46 | 48 |
| Median rent | $460/wk | $410/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $2,200,000 | $1,980,000 |
| Population | 6,555 | 10,929 |
| Full profile | Belfield in full | Croydon Park in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Belfield scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Croydon Park has the lower median house price of the two ($1,980,000 vs $2,200,000).
Belfield scores higher on 3 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Belfield or Croydon Park.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →