Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 2.0 km apart, on the same open data. Bossley Park scores higher on 4 of 10 measures.
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 35 | 30 |
| Safety | 82 | 78 |
| Wealth | 13 | 21 |
| Value | 5 | 33 |
| Parks | 48 | 32 |
| Cafés | 13 | 32 |
| Transit | 35 | 39 |
| Green space | 52 | 78 |
| Active & healthy | 27 | 34 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 55 | 48 |
| Median rent | $465/wk | $450/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $1,525,000 | $1,525,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 71 | 71 |
| Population | 15,492 | 10,279 |
| Full profile | Bossley Park in full | Edensor Park in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Bossley Park scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Bossley Park and Edensor Park have the same median house price.
Bossley Park scores higher on 4 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Bossley Park or Edensor Park.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →