Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 1.8 km apart, on the same open data. Casula scores higher on 3 of 10 measures.
| Casula | Lurnea | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 25 | 37 |
| Safety | 27 | 37 |
| Wealth | 18 | 4 |
| Value | 22 | 4 |
| Parks | 50 | 58 |
| Cafés | 46 | 35 |
| Transit | 26 | 75 |
| Green space | 65 | 72 |
| Active & healthy | 54 | 58 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 46 | 62 |
| Median rent | $450/wk | $380/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $1,300,000 | $1,300,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 152 | 152 |
| Population | 16,584 | 10,057 |
| Full profile | Casula in full | Lurnea in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Lurnea scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Casula and Lurnea have the same median house price.
Casula scores higher on 3 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Casula or Lurnea.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →