Two neighbouring Sydney suburbs, 1.6 km apart, on the same open data. Chipping Norton scores higher on 3 of 10 measures.
| Chipping Norton | Lansvale | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 18 | 30 |
| Safety | 48 | 12 |
| Wealth | 35 | 12 |
| Value | 35 | 20 |
| Parks | 72 | 83 |
| Cafés | 38 | 48 |
| Transit | 10 | 14 |
| Green space | 71 | 78 |
| Active & healthy | 60 | 71 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 31 | 36 |
| Median rent | $500/wk | $400/wk |
| Median house price (Jan–Mar 2026) | $1,300,000 | $1,316,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 152 | 66 |
| Population | 9,412 | 2,595 |
| Full profile | Chipping Norton in full | Lansvale in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 422 Sydney suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Chipping Norton scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Chipping Norton has the lower median house price of the two ($1,300,000 vs $1,316,000).
Chipping Norton scores higher on 3 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Chipping Norton or Lansvale.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Sydney suburbs →