Two neighbouring Brisbane suburbs, 2.4 km apart, on the same open data. Clontarf scores higher on 6 of 10 measures.
| Clontarf | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 78 | 48 |
| Safety | 42 | 42 |
| Wealth | 12 | 7 |
| Value | 13 | 4 |
| Parks | 25 | 49 |
| Cafés | 46 | 36 |
| Transit | 25 | 57 |
| Green space | 86 | 52 |
| Active & healthy | 69 | 53 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 37 | 62 |
| Median rent | $345/wk | $350/wk |
| Median house price (Apr 2025–Mar 2026) | $955,000 | $900,000 |
| House sales in the 12 months to March 2026 | 172 | 267 |
| Population | 8,446 | 9,745 |
| Full profile | Clontarf in full | Kippa-Ring in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 277 Brisbane suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Clontarf and Kippa-Ring score the same for safety on official crime statistics.
Kippa-Ring has the lower median house price of the two ($900,000 vs $955,000).
Clontarf scores higher on 6 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Clontarf or Kippa-Ring.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Brisbane suburbs →