Two neighbouring Brisbane suburbs, 2.1 km apart, on the same open data. Loganholme scores higher on 6 of 10 measures.
| Loganholme | Tanah Merah | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 49 | 41 |
| Safety | 54 | 54 |
| Wealth | 34 | 39 |
| Value | 37 | 53 |
| Parks | 78 | 57 |
| Cafés | 70 | 14 |
| Transit | 23 | 24 |
| Green space | 60 | 48 |
| Active & healthy | 58 | 35 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 45 | 11 |
| Median rent | $395/wk | $380/wk |
| Median house price (Apr 2025–Mar 2026) | $929,880 | $929,880 |
| House sales in the 12 months to March 2026 | 186 | 186 |
| Population | 6,764 | 4,754 |
| Full profile | Loganholme in full | Tanah Merah in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 277 Brisbane suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Loganholme and Tanah Merah score the same for safety on official crime statistics.
Loganholme and Tanah Merah have the same median house price.
Loganholme scores higher on 6 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Loganholme or Tanah Merah.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Brisbane suburbs →