Two neighbouring Melbourne suburbs, 3.8 km apart, on the same open data. Glen Waverley scores higher on 2 of 10 measures.
| Glen Waverley | Mount Waverley | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 59 | 66 |
| Safety | 62 | 68 |
| Wealth | 36 | 54 |
| Value | 12 | 23 |
| Parks | 70 | 72 |
| Cafés | 56 | 48 |
| Transit | 33 | 26 |
| Green space | 42 | 54 |
| Active & healthy | 48 | 58 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 38 | 44 |
| Median rent | $480/wk | $476/wk |
| Median house price (Oct–Dec 2025) | $1,800,000 | $1,590,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 134 | 131 |
| Population | 42,642 | 35,340 |
| Full profile | Glen Waverley in full | Mount Waverley in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 216 Melbourne suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Mount Waverley scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Mount Waverley has the lower median house price of the two ($1,590,000 vs $1,800,000).
Glen Waverley scores higher on 2 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Glen Waverley or Mount Waverley.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Melbourne suburbs →