Two neighbouring Melbourne suburbs, 1.9 km apart, on the same open data. Oak Park scores higher on 8 of 10 measures.
| Oak Park | Pascoe Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Active | 58 | 26 |
| Safety | 85 | 66 |
| Wealth | 69 | 48 |
| Value | 88 | 65 |
| Parks | 60 | 32 |
| Cafés | 41 | 78 |
| Transit | 17 | 57 |
| Green space | 66 | 46 |
| Active & healthy | 54 | 48 |
| Schools nearby (OSM) | 73 | 44 |
| Median rent | $401/wk | $400/wk |
| Median house price (Oct–Dec 2025) | $1,120,000 | $1,050,000 |
| House sales this quarter | 21 | 59 |
| Population | 6,714 | 18,171 |
| Full profile | Oak Park in full | Pascoe Vale in full |
Scores are percentiles across all 216 Melbourne suburbs: 100 is the best in the city, 50 is mid-table. Highlighted figures lead the row. How we rank suburbs.
Oak Park scores higher for safety (recorded crime per 1,000 residents) between the two, based on official crime statistics.
Pascoe Vale has the lower median house price of the two ($1,050,000 vs $1,120,000).
Oak Park scores higher on 8 of 10 measures across safety, activity, value, parks and cafés — see the full breakdown below, or the complete profile for Oak Park or Pascoe Vale.
Updated October 2026. Compare other Melbourne suburbs →